J. THOMAS TURNER, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN W. TEMPLE, JR., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Turner appeals from a trial court judgment that permanently enjoined him from enforcing a Tennessee money judgment in Florida. The appellate court reversed, holding that a Tennessee chancery court judgment was entitled to full faith and credit under Florida law, and that the foreign judgment was properly domesticated.
A Tennessee chancery court judgment is entitled to full faith and credit in Florida proceedings because Tennessee law grants chancery courts concurrent jurisdiction with circuit courts over all civil causes of action, and Tennessee law provides that execution upon a chancery decree issues as a matter of course thirty days from rendition.
[1] A Florida court must give full faith and credit to a valid foreign judgment, including monetary judgments issued by a court of equity in the foreign jurisdiction.
[2] When enforcing a foreign judgment, Florida courts are confined to the law of the foreign state to assess the jurisdiction and validity of the foreign court's judgment.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We are confined to the law of the foreign state in assessing both of those concerns.”
Establishes that the appellate court must apply Tennessee law, not Florida law, in evaluating the foreign judgment's validity and finality.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn March 1990, a Tennessee chancery court entered a money judgment in favor of Turner against Temple for enforcing a material-men's lien. Turner recor…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Domestication Of Foreign Judgments cases and more on FLexlaw
FRANK, Chief Judge.
J. Thomas Turner appeals from a final judgment permanently enjoining him from enforcing his foreign judgment in Florida. The trial court erred.
On March 21, 1990, the Tennessee chancery court entered a money judgment adverse to John Temple and in favor of Thomas Turner in an action to enforce a material-men’s lien. No appeal was taken from that judgment.
On October 17, 1990, Turner recorded his Tennessee judgment in Florida in accordance with section 55.501-.509, Florida Statutes (1989), Florida’s Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act. Temple challenged domestication of the foreign judgment by filing the present action contesting the jurisdiction of the Tennessee court and the validity of the foreign judgment. Despite its initial inclination to rule in Turner’s favor, the trial court doubted the enforceability of a money judgment issuing from a Tennessee court of chancery and, ultimately, disallowed its domestication. Turner moved for rehearing and attached to the motion a subsequent order of the Tennessee court altering and clarifying the foreign judgment: “[T]he Court’s final judgment ... is a money judgment in favor of the plaintiff, J. Thomas Turner, against the defendant, John W. Temple, Jr., in the amount set forth in the Court’s order for which execution shall issue.” When the motion for rehearing was denied, Turner appealed.
It is evident the trial court questioned the finality of the foreign judgment and whether the chancery court, as a court of equity, had jurisdiction to enter monetary relief. We are confined to the law of the foreign state in assessing both of those concerns. Trauger v. AJ. Spagnol Lumber Co., 442 So. 2d 182 (Fla.1983); Hinchee v. Golden Oak Bank, 540 So. 2d 262 (Fla.2d DCA 1989).
In Tennessee, with limited exceptions not applicable here, the chancery court shares with the circuit court jurisdiction of “all civil causes of action.” Tenn.Code Ann. § 16 — 11— 102 (1989).
Tennessee law also provides that execution upon a decree entered in chancery shall issue as a matter of course thirty days from rendition without the necessity of a subsequent decree ordering enforcement. See Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-1-102 (1989); Hyder v. Butler, 108 Tenn. 289, 52 S.W. 876 (1899) (“The judgment or decree is in and of itself an award of execution”).
Accordingly, in light of the Tennessee chancellor’s concurrent jurisdiction to issue monetary and equitable relief and that court’s subsequent order affirming the finality of the initial decree, we conclude that Turner’s Tennessee judgment was entitled to full faith and credit in the Florida proceeding.
Reversed.
RYDER and HALL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Trans Healthcare, Inc. v. Creekmore, 137 So. 3d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…ry order. Baker v. General Motors Corp., 522 U.S. 222, 118 S.Ct. 657, 189 L.Ed.2d 580 (1998); Joannou v. Corsini, 543 So. 2d 308, 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Finality, for this purpose, is determined under the laws of the other state. Turner v. Temple, 625 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). The Florida Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act establishes the procedure for the recognition of “foreign judgments,” defined as “any judgment, decree, or order of a court of any other state or of the United States if such judg…
-
D'Anna Welsh v. Martinez, 350 So. 3d 811 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022)…hat are nonfinal and modifiable are not entitled to full faith and credit. West v. West, 301 So. 2d 823, 826–27 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). We determine the finality of these orders under the laws of the foreign state of Connecticut. See Turner v. Temple, 625 So. 2d 101, 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Ms. Welsh argues that the Connecticut contempt order and capias both meet the test governing finality as set forth in State v. Curcio, 463 A. 2d 566, 569–70 (Conn. 1983).5 5 Ms. Welsh also argues in her brief that Mr. Marti…
Authorities Cited
- Trauger v. A.J. Spagnol Lumber Co., Inc., 442 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 1983)
- Hinchee v. Golden OAK Bank, 540 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)