JUAN CARLOS ESTEFANI, JUAN GONZALEZ ESTEFANI, DALIA R. GONZALEZ, LUIS F. BRYON AND DIVINA BRYON, APPELLANTS,
v.
LIBIA PENAFIEL, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Abuse Of Discretion (Standard Of Review) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
A trial court has broad discretion in matters of custody and visitation rights. Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1975).
After a thorough examination of the record, we find that there is substantial competent evidence to support the decision of the trial court terminating the visitation rights of the father, paternal grandparents, and paternal great-grandparents, see Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1976); Freeburg v. Freeburg, 596 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Hunter v. Hunter, 540 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); T'Felt v. T'Felt, 446 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), and allowing the mother to remove the children from Dade County. See Fabre v. Levine, 618 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
We do not find an abuse of discretion by the trial judge and we, therefore, affirm. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mauranssi v. Centerline Utils. Contract Co. & Claims Ctr., 685 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…should be determined prospectively by using either the contract of employment or the claimant’s actual earnings on the job where the claimant is working at the time of the injury.” Efficient Sys., Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Labor and Employment Sec., 624 So. 2d 343, 345 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Determinations under subsection (l)(f) are similarly prospective. Section 440.14(l)(d), Florida Statutes (1995), has been construed to give the judge of compensation claims considerable latitude in choosing an appropriate…
-
Stubbs v. BOB Dale Constr. & Fla. Preferred, 977 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…should be determined prospectively by using either the contract of employment or the claimant’s actual earnings on the job where the claimant is working at the time of the injury.” Efficient Sys., Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Labor and Employment Sec., 624 So. 2d 343, 345 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Determinations under subsection (l)(f) are similarly prospective. Accordingly, on remand, the JCC shall determine which subsection of section 440.14(1) should be applied to claimant’s AWW calculation. BARFIELD and HAWKES,…
-
Starling v. Starling, 656 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Estefani v. Penafiel, 624 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (trial court has broad discretion in matters of custody); Strickland, v. Strickland, 509 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (substantial competent evidence supported trial court’s determination that best interests of child would be be…
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)
- Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 1975)
- Hunter v. Hunter, 540 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
- Fabre v. Levine, 618 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
- T'Felt v. T'Felt, 446 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- Freeburg v. Freeburg, 596 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)