RONALD W. ROBISON, APPELLANT,
v.
ELIZABETH A. ROBISON, FOR HERSELF AND ON BEHALF OF LAD ASSOCIATES, A FLORIDA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1993-08-10
No. 92-02815
Before NESBITT, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
622 So. 2d 593 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The husband, Ronald W. Robison, appeals from an adverse final judgment entered in favor of the wife, Elizabeth A. Robison, and LAD Associates. We affirm since the record contains competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determination that the transfers made to the husband constituted fraudulent transfers. See Teichner & Mella, P.A. v. Butler, 600 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 3d DCA1992); Randy Int’l, Ltd. v. American Excess Corp., 501 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA1987); § 726.-106(2), Fla.Stat. (1991).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kassier v. Kipnis, 677 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …, to their partners for $75,000 was not prohibited by the Assign [*374] ment of Proceeds and was not a fraudulent transfer where the partners did not have notice of the Assignment of Proceeds and paid reasonably equivalent value. Robison v. Robison, 622 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Ferre v. City Nat’l Bank of Miami, 548 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Consequently, we find that the trial court properly adopted the special master’s findings and properly ordered that the $75,000 proceeds derived from the Kassi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw