ROOSEVELT F. RICHARDSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROOSEVELT F. RICHARDSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
621 So. 2d 736
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from convictions for delivery of cocaine and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. We affirm the conviction for delivery of cocaine. Because the evidence to support the conviction for conspiracy to traffic is legally insufficient we reverse that conviction and order appellant discharged on that count.
AFFIRMED • in part; REVERSED in part.
HARRIS and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Meister Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Am. Fid. Fire Insur. Co., 781 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…udgment below is affirmed on an application of the doctrine of res judicata. See Gomez-Ortega v. Dorten, Inc., 670 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); ICC Chem. Corp. v. Freeman, 640 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Posnansky v. Breckenridge Estates Corp., 621 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Commercial Laundries, Inc. v. Golf Course Towers Assocs., 568 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Pan Am. Bank of Miami v. City of Miami Beach, 198 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).…