WILLIAM EARL BANKS, APPELLANT,
v.
SALTMARSH, CLEAVELAND AND GUND, P.A., AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE HERMAN W. JORDAN SELF TRUSTEED TRUST, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1993-06-11
No. 92-2599
ZEHMER, BARFIELD and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
619 So. 2d 473 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*474] PER CURIAM.

The record presented to this Court, which does not properly include documents attached to the answer brief, will not support summary judgment. The final summary judgment is REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.

ZEHMER, BARFIELD and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (13 total)

  • Smith v. State, 892 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
    …st 12, 2003, is also in error. After the hearing, the trial court stated that it found appellant “not guilty” of this alleged violation. The trial court’s order revoking community control must conform to its oral pronouncements. See Maddox v. State, 619 So. 2d 473, 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Accordingly, we reverse [*516] the trial court’s findings that the Appellant violated condition (11) of his community control. IV. Conclusion We reverse the trial court’s revocation of appellant’s probation based upon vio…
  • Taramona v. State, 707 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
    …s and the evidence relied upon for the revocation to writing in accordance with the court’s oral pronouncement. See Salvatierra v. State, 691 So. 2d 32, 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Bryant v. State, 686 So. 2d 784, 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Maddox v. State, 619 So. 2d 473, 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). As this will be purely a ministerial act, we deem the appellant’s presence to be unnecessary. See Culliver v. State, 693 So. 2d 1152, 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Boggs v. State, 557 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Dunlap v. St…
  • Ervin Robinson v. State, 963 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
    …nding that appellant violated probation and the judgment and sentence imposed thereafter, but the cause is remanded with directions to enter a corrected order revoking probation which conforms to the court’s oral pronouncements. See Maddox v. State, 619 So. 2d 473, 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (holding that a trial court’s order revoking supervision must conform to its oral pronouncements). The amended affidavit of violation of probation charged that appellant violated nine conditions of probation. At the violat…

Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw