BRAXTON BEACHAM AND BERTHA BEACHAM, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
D. C. HILL, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed interlocutory orders issued by the Circuit Court, finding no errors in the lower court's decisions.
No, the Florida Supreme Court found no errors in the interlocutory orders of the Circuit Court.
“This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former day of this term upon the transcript of the record of the Interlocutory Orders appealed from, and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there are no errors in the said Interlocutory Orders”
This quote describes the court's review process and initial finding regarding the interlocutory orders.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellants, Braxton Beacham and Bertha Beacham, appealed interlocutory orders from the Circuit Court. The case was submitted to the Florida Suprem…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former day of this term upon the transcript of the record of the Interlocutory Orders appealed from, and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there are no errors in the said Interlocutory Orders; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Interlocutory Orders of the Circuit Court be and the same are hereby affirmed; it is further ordered that the appellee do have and recover of and from the appellants his costs by him in this behalf expended, which costs are taxed at the sum of $-, all of which is ordered to be certified to the Court below.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hill v. Braxton Beacham and Berta Beacham, 79 Fla. 430 (Fla. 1920)…A demurrer by defendants was interposed to this bill in February, 1914, and Mrs. Beacham interposed a separate demurrer also. In February, 1915, these demurrers were overruled. An appeal was taken and the orders were affirmed. See Beacham v. Hill, 70 Fla. 441, 70 South. Rep. 1019. In March, 1916, the defendant Braxton Beacham answered the bill, denying thé alleged partnership agreement and' all the allegations of the bills that the various transactions were made in pursuance of any such agreement. He av…