A. L. YORK AND G. JACKSON, JR., ASSIGNEES, APPELLANTS,
v.
W. M. HAMER AND WILLIAMS HOLDING COMPANY, APPELLEES
A. L. YORK AND G. JACKSON, JR., ASSIGNEES, APPELLANTS,
W. M. HAMER AND WILLIAMS HOLDING COMPANY, APPELLEES
100 Fla. 1591
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 132 So. 186
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted. to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there are no errors in the said orders; it is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said orders of the circuit court be, and the same are hereby, affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Linehan v. State, 476 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1985)…icious burning of a dwelling house, or outhouse within the curtilage of a dwelling of another.” Duke v. State, 132 Fla. 865, 870, 185 So. 422, 425 (1938). See also Sawyer v. State, 100 Fla. 1603, 132 So. 188 (1931); Williams v. State, 100 Fla. 1054, 132 So. 186 (1930). Under this definition, a specific intent to burn is not required. See Dorroh v. State, 229 Miss. 315, 90 So. 2d 653 (1956); Crow v. State, 136 Tenn. 333, 189 S.W. 687 (1916). We find that the present statutory definition of arson does not ma…
-
State v. Burch, 545 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…onship with the subject of sections 2 and 3 and that the object of section 1 is separate and disassociated from the object of sections 2 and 3. State ex rel. Landis v. Thompson, 120 Fla. 860, 163 So. 270 (1935); and Williams v. State, 100 Fla. 1054, 132 So. 186 (1930). We hold that section 1 of 82-150 was enacted in violation of the one-subject provision of article III, section 6, Florida Constitution. They find Chapter 87-243 similar to the legislation stricken in Bunnell in that 87-243 contains sections…
-
Bunnell v. State, 453 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 1984)…onship with the subject of sections 2 and 3 and that the object of section 1 is separate and disassociated from the object of sections 2 and 3. State ex rel. Landis v. Thompson, 120 Fla. 860, 163 So. 270 (1935); and Williams v. State, 100 Fla. 1054, 132 So. 186 (1930). We hold that section 1 of 82-150 was enacted in violation of the one-subject provision of article III, section 6, Florida Constitution. The district court decision is quashed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinio…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence