TERRY ROLISON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Terry Rolison, challenges a restitution order requiring him to pay restitution in the total amount of $27,300.00. Our examination of the record in this cause reveals that the restitution obligation was not a part of the negotiated plea agreement. Since the sentencing disposition did not follow the terms of the plea agreement, the matter must be reversed and remanded for resentencing. Prior to resentencing, if the trial court again determines to exceed the bounds of the plea agreement, appellant must be given an opportunity to withdraw his plea.
Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for resentencing.
JOANOS, C.J., and ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jacobs v. Westgate, 766 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…Valdes v. Faby Enters., Inc., 483 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Where there is no evidence tending to prove a plaintiffs comparative negligence, the issue should be taken from the jury. See Florida Ass’n of Workers for the Blind, Inc. v. Guillaume, 618 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Regarding the issue of the defendants’ negligent care of Jacobs’ property, the record reflects that the evidence of negligence in this case was overwhelming and reasonable people could not differ. Westgate admitted at trial that…1 / 2
-
Woodard v. Armenian Cultural Ass'n OF Am., Inc., 724 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…skin, 401 So. 2d 884, 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). “It is well-settled that ‘where there is no evidence tending to prove comparative negligence, the issue should not be submitted to the jury.’ ” Florida Ass’n of Workers for the Blind, Inc. v. Guillaume, 618 So. 2d 275, 276 [*672] (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)(quoting Coulter v. American Bakeries Co., 530 So. 2d 1009, 1010 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)); see also Cuadros v. Carnival Cruise Lines, 604 So. 2d 861, 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). The evidence adduced at trial in the instant case…
-
Terry Plumbing & Home Servs., Inc. v. Berry, 900 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…Plumbing admitted that the attack was unprovoked. A trial court is authorized to grant a Motion for Directed Verdict when there is no evidence to support the plaintiffs comparative negligence. Fla. Ass’n of Workers for the Blind, Inc. v. Guillaume, 618 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). However, a Motion for Directed Verdict should be treated with special caution because it is the function of the jury to weigh and evaluate the evidence. Nunez v. Lee County, 777 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Pascale v. Fed. Exp…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence