IN THE INTEREST OF B.S., A CHILD. IN THE INTEREST OF T.S., A CHILD. IN THE INTEREST OF D.J., A CHILD
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Modification Of Orders cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals three juveniles were adjudicated as delinquents for burglary and grand theft and placed on community control with special conditions, including payment of restitution to the victim.
Contrary to appellants’ assertions, we find no error concerning the amount of restitution required to be made by each. The state concedes, on the authority of such cases as J.A.M. v. State, 601 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) and Rimmer v. State, 601 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), the orders of restitution should be modified to provide that the respective appellants, presently unemployed, shall be obligated to begin paying restitution only upon obtaining earnings from employment that will permit compliance with the condition.
The order of community control with special condition requiring restitution are severally affirmed as to amount but remanded for modification consistent herewith.
ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A.C. v. State, 837 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…stitution order to provide that appellant shall begin paying restitution at a rate of $30 per month upon securing employment and that he shall make every reasonable effort to secure employment upon release from the level six program. See In re B.S., 616 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Rimmer v. State, 601 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- In the Interest of J.A.M. v. State, 601 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- van Tassell v. State, 601 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
- Rimmer v. State, 601 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)