GERTRUDE CAROL KOLOIAN, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
CORAL PLAZA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., TAMARAC PAINT & WALLPAPER, INC., AND HANDO AND SONS PAINTING COMPANY, INC., APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS
GERTRUDE CAROL KOLOIAN, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
CORAL PLAZA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., TAMARAC PAINT & WALLPAPER, INC., AND HANDO AND SONS PAINTING COMPANY, INC., APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS
616 So. 2d 186
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
LETTS and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.
Concurrence
ANSTEAD, Judge,
concurring specially.
Under the specific circumstances of this case, I agree with the majority that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error by the trial court rulings challenged on appeal.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gilbert v. State, 817 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…amcast video game, headphones and the VCR at the time of the theft exceeded $300. Accordingly, Appellant’s conviction is reduced from grand theft to petit theft and the case is remanded for resentencing. See I.T., 796 So. 2d at 1222; Jones v. State, 616 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Toler, 779 So. 2d at 595. Reversed and remanded. WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.…
-
I.T. v. State, 796 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…dge of the items’ value or condition. Further, he did not testify as to the market value of the items at the time of the theft. See Negron v. State, 306 So. 2d 104, 108 (Fla.1974)(state must establish value at the time of the theft); Jones v. State, 616 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); see e.g., Massey v. State, 575 So. 2d 1372, 1373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)(owner demonstrated cost of stolen bicycle by testifying as to the purchase price and the costs expended on improving the bicycle and its condition at the time…