METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, PETITIONER/APPELLANT,
v.
KELLY TRIBBLE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ANGELINA TRIBBLE, DECEASED, ET AL., RESPONDENTS/APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In a wrongful death action arising from a traffic collision caused by a malfunctioning traffic light, the court reversed the judgment against the county, holding that the taxi driver's decision to proceed through a visibly malfunctioning intersection constituted a superseding intervening cause that absolved the county of liability.
The county is not liable because the taxi driver's actions constituted a superseding intervening cause. When a traffic signal malfunctions, the practical effect is that motorists must treat the intersection as a four-way stop. The taxi driver's decision to proceed despite knowing the light was malfunctioning and being aware of proper safety procedures constituted a separate and unusual action that broke the causal chain between the county's negligent maintenance and the accident.
[1] When a traffic signal malfunctions, motorists should treat the intersection as a four-way stop.
[2] A driver's awareness of a malfunctioning traffic signal and subsequent decision to proceed based on a perceived green light can constitute a superseding intervening cause…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“when a traffic signal is energized and fully functioning, it forms the basis for a motorist either proceeding or yielding in the intersection. In the alternative, however, when the traffic device malfunctions, the practical effect is for some or all of the motorists to treat the intersection as a four-way stop.”
Establishes the legal framework for motorist conduct depending on traffic signal status
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA van carrying the deceased was struck by a taxi cab at an intersection in Miami-Dade County. The traffic signal at the intersection had a burned-out …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Superseding Cause cases and more on FLexlaw
NESBITT, Judge.
Plaintiff, Kelly Tribble, as personal representative of Angelina Tribble, deceased, filed an amended complaint alleging the county failed to properly maintain an intersection traffic light, at which the van the decedent was riding in was struck by a taxi cab. The traffic device malfunctioned because it is undisputed that the red light bulb on the device was burned out in the direction from which the taxi approached the device. The cab driver admitted that he was aware of the intersection and testified he knew of the proper procedure to follow when confronted with a malfunctioning traffic signal. He testified that he nonetheless proceeded into the intersection because he had the green light. His testimony was buttressed by one eyewitness. The driver of the van in which the child was riding testified that he had the green light and that the taxi went through the intersection in what could have been the red phase of the traffic device. That testimony was buttressed by an eyewitness.
At the close of the plaintiff’s case in chief, the county moved for a directed verdict on the basis that, as a matter of law, the cab driver’s interdiction at the intersection constituted a superseding intervening cause of the accident exculpating the county from responsibility. In the alternative, the county argued that the van had illegally crossed the intersection, and the same result of no liability on the county’s part should obtain. We observe, under section 316.123, Florida Statutes (1991), that when a traffic signal is energized and fully functioning, it forms the basis for a motorist either proceeding or yielding in the intersection. In the alternative, however, when the traffic device malfunctions, the practical effect is for some or all of the motorists to treat the intersection as a four-way stop.
In Metropolitan Dade County v. Colina, 456 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), we determined that under parallel conditions the county was exculpated from liability. Although there is a superficial factual distinction between this case and Colina, they are actually quite close. It is undisputed that the burned out red light bulb in the traffic device was clearly visible. As a consequence, the cab driver had to treat the intersection as though it were regulated by á four-way stop sign. Thus, the jury’s finding places the cab driver in the position of having disobeyed the traffic signals in derogation of his own personal safety and that of the motoring public. Consequently, his actions constituted a separate and unusual action rendering it a superseding and intervening cause of the accident.
For the foregoing reasons, the adverse judgment against the county and in favor of the claimant is reversed with directions.
Reversed and remanded.