CITY OF MIAMI, APPELLANT,
v.
EDWARD J. KING, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1992-12-22
No. 92-1594
JOANOS, C.J., and SMITH and MINER, JJ., concur.
614 So. 2d 1119 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order on appeal based upon this court’s opinion in City of Miami v. Bell, 606 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We certify to the Florida Supreme Court as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Bell.

JOANOS, C.J., and SMITH and MINER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Dep't OF Revenue v. The Printing House, 644 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 1994)
    …T TO ARTICLE I, SECTION 22 OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, IN A TAX REFUND CASE UNDER SECTION 72.011(1), FLORIDA STATUTES, WHERE ONE OF THE CONDITIONS OF SECTION 72.011(3), FLORIDA STATUTES, HAS BEEN MET? Printing House, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 614 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We hold that a taxpayer has no right to a jury trial when contesting tax assessments, but a taxpayer who pays the assessment under protest and requests a refund is entitled to…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw