DOUGLAS CAREY HAMILTON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1993-02-04
No. 80298
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
612 So. 2d 583 Florida Supreme Court (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Hamilton v. State, 603 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on certified conflict with Tarawneh v. State, 588 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), review denied, 598 So. 2d 78 (Fla.1992), disapproved, Hayles v. State, 608 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on Hayles, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rodriguez v. State, 657 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Hamilton v. State, 603 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), approved, 612 So. 2d 583 (Fla.1993); Roth v. State, 601 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), approved, 616 So. 2d 11 (Fla.1993).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw