NORBERT KAPALA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1993-01-13
No. 92-3546
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and FARMER, J., concur., ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.
610 So. 2d 741 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We treat the order on appeal as summarily denying appellant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and affirm.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and FARMER, J., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurrence
ANSTEAD, Judge,

[*742] ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially.

While it appears that appellant’s pending motion for post-conviction relief may be without merit, it also appears that he may be able to amend the petition to state a claim under our recent decision in Hassoun v. State, 609 So. 2d 1347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw