EARL JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Earl Johnson, a prisoner, appealed a circuit court's denial of his petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the Florida Parole Commission to establish his effective parole release date. The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the denial, holding that Johnson had no legal right to such relief because statutory law required the Commission to conduct the review only within 90 days before his presumptive parole release date, which was not yet due.
The court affirmed the denial of the mandamus petition, holding that Johnson had no legal right to have an effective parole release date established at that time because Florida law required the Commission to conduct such a review only within 90 days before the PPRD, which had not yet arrived. Therefore, the question of whether the trial court failed to consider Johnson's late reply was irrelevant.
[1] A prisoner has no legal right to have an effective parole release date established until the Parole Commission conducts a review within 90 days before the presumptive par…
[2] Mandamus cannot be used to establish a legal right that does not currently exist.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“By statute, the Parole Commission must conduct a review in order to establish an effective parole release date within 90 days before the PPRD.”
Establishes the statutory framework limiting when the Commission must conduct the required review
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJohnson was sentenced on October 18, 1978, for burglary, sexual battery, robbery, and kidnapping. In 1980, the Parole Commission established his presu…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Effective Parole Release Date cases and more on FLexlaw
KAHN, Judge.
Earl Johnson, a prisoner under various sentences of imprisonment for burglary, sexual battery, robbery and kidnapping, appeals an adverse order entered by the circuit court on his petition for writ of mandamus. By such petition, Johnson sought to require the Parole Commission (Commission) to establish his effective parole release date.
Johnson received his sentences on October 18, 1978. In 1980, the Commission established his presumptive parole release date (PPRD) at October 9, 2007. This PPRD was not changed after several subsequent biennial reviews. § 947.174, Fla. Stat. (1991). On January 3, 1991, Johnson requested the Commission to set an effective parole release date, which it declined to do. Johnson pursued the matter by filing his petition for writ of mandamus on October 4, 1991. On November 14, 1991, the circuit court issued an order to show cause requiring the Commission to file a response within thirty days, and allowing Johnson ten days thereafter to reply. The Commission’s response was timely filed on December 13, 1991. The circuit court entered an order denying Johnson’s petition on January 8, 1992. On January 13, 1992, Johnson filed his reply. Johnson argues that while his petition was pending in the circuit court he was moved by the state from one institution to another, and that he duly notified the clerk of the circuit court of his address change on December 16, 1991. In spite of such notification, Johnson did not receive the Commission's response until January 2, 1992, some twenty days after the response was filed, and thus, ten days late. Johnson argues that the circuit court’s order must be reversed and remanded because the court failed to properly consider his reply before denying his petition. We reject this argument and affirm.
By statute, the Parole Commission must conduct a review in order to establish an effective parole release date within 90 days before the PPRD. § 947.-1745(1), Fla.Stat. (1991). Accordingly, Johnson has no legal right at the present time to have established an effective parole release date. Since mandamus cannot be used to establish a legal right, State, Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Serv. v. Hartsfield, 399 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), the question of whether the trial court failed to consider Johnson’s reply is irrelevant.
AFFIRMED.
SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.