CHARLES FROW, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Kosek v. State, 640 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
  …Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. His post-denial motions did not toll the time for filing his appeal and he did so untimely. Ketion v. State, 599 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Griffis v. State, 593 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Newman v. State, 610 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). DISMISSED. HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.…
• Letarius Mathis v. State, 720 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
  …ssed to orders rendered pursuant to rule 3.800(a) are not authorized, and they do not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal. See, e.g., Kosek v. State, 640 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. dismissed, 648 So. 2d 723 (Fla.1994); Newman v. State, 610 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Griffis v. State, 593 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Thus, Mathis’ appeal is untimely. We have previously pointed out this “trap” for the unwary, but until the rules are changed, we are bound by established precedent. Since M…
• Campbell v. State, 637 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …nviction relief for lack of jurisdiction. The notice of appeal was filed well past thirty days from the order denying the motion. Appellant’s motion for rehearing in the trial court did not postpone rendition of the order on appeal. Newman v. State, 610 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (rule 3.800 does not authorize a motion for rehearing and thus a motion for rehearing does not postpone rendition of the order on appeal). The notice in the instant case was therefore untimely and this court lacks jurisdiction to…

Authorities Cited

• State of Fla. ex rel. Terry Michael Hanks & Rudolph Frank Seymour v. The Honorable Murray Goodman, 253 So. 2d 129 (Fla. 1971)
• Honorable Jack M. Turner v. State ex rel. Michael J. Pellerin, 272 So. 2d 129 (Fla. 1973)
• State v. Kaufman, 421 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)