WALTER A. INGRAM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1992-12-09
No. 92-03249
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
609 So. 2d 166 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Ingram appeals the dismissal of his post-conviction relief motion. We affirm. The trial court properly dismissed Ingram’s motion because it did not comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987. We also find that the claims Ingram raises to support his motion are without merit.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Dep't OF Transp. v. DiGERLANDO, 638 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1994)
    …SHAW, Justice. We have for review Department of Transportation v. DiGerlando, 609 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), in which the court affirmed an order granting DiGerlando summary judgment and certified the following question as being of great public importance: WHETHER ALL LANDOWNERS WITH PROPERTY INSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF INVALIDATED MAPS…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw