HINCH FORMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Roan Peart v. State, 756 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 2000)
  …eded Ginebra to the extent of any inconsistency. ”). . See Beckles, 679 So. 2d at 892 (holding that being taken into custody by immigration authorities because of the conviction based on the plea was sufficient to show prejudice); Spencer v. State, 608 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)(holding that appellate immigration court decision that defendant was deportable was sufficient to show prejudice); see also State v. Oakley, 715 So. 2d 956, 957 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(holding that defendant failed to show prejudice,…
• State v. Seraphin, 818 So. 2d 485 (Fla. 2002)
  …inebra to the extent of any inconsistency.”). [Note 6] See Beckles, 679 So. 2d at 892 (holding that being taken into custody by immigration authorities because of the conviction based on the plea was sufficient to show prejudice); Spencer v. State, 608 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (holding that appellate immigration court decision that defendant was de-portable was sufficient to show prejudice); see also State v. Oakley, 715 So. 2d 956, 957 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding that defendant failed to show prejudi…
• Owran Green v. State, 895 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …of prejudice as required under Simmons v. State, 489 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).” [e.s.] 605 So. 2d at 987. Indisputably the word possibility in the first sentence is a refer [*444] ent of threat in the second. Additionally, in Spencer v. State, 608 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), our finding of a threat was based solely on an appellate immigration decision finding defendant deportable, the very circumstance that exists in this case. There was no suggestion that proceedings to deport him had actually been…

Authorities Cited

• Avery Jones v. State, 589 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)