I.V., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• W.E.P., Jr. v. State, 790 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
  …. Because the evidence as a whole was “as susceptible of the conclusion that [Munday] was trying to extricate the car, as it is of an intent to assault the witness,” the third district reversed the conviction. Id. at 34. Similarly, in I.V. v. State, 608 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), “I.V. was adjudicated delinquent on a finding that he had committed an aggravated battery.” Citing Munday, the court reversed “on the ground that the record does not establish that the shooting in question was intentional, rather…
• Haugabook v. State, 689 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …lleges ineffective assistance of counsel during the course of the trial will have the opportunity, if necessary, to obtain post-trial relief through rule 3.850. We easily reconcile this result with a seemingly contrary outcome in Lockwood v. State, 608 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), where the defendant filed a motion to discharge his trial counsel after the trial but before sentencing. This court affirmed the defendant’s convictions, but remanded for resentencing, holding that the court failed to conduct “t…
• Lockwood v. State, 632 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …ellant was found guilty of two counts of lewd and lascivious assault upon a child and was sentenced to fifteen years on each count to run concurrently. On appeal, this court affirmed his convictions, but remanded for resentencing. Lockwood v. State, 608 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). On remand, the trial court resentenced Lockwood to fifteen years incarceration for count one and ten years probation for count two to run consecutively. This appeal follows. The state concedes that the trial court incorrectly…

Authorities Cited

• State v. In the Interest of V. D. B., 270 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 1972)
• Pilar Navarro v. Yosemite Ins. Co., 254 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)