IN THE INTEREST OF BABY BOY B

Citator

Cited By

• First Union Nat'l Bank OF Fla., N.A. v. Peoples Nat'l Bank OF Commerce, 644 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
  …n by the plaintiff/appellee Peoples National Bank of Commerce, Miami, because, without dispute, this injunctive relief was entered sua sponte by the court in the absence of required pleadings and notice. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(a); Camji v. Helmsley, 602 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Shouman v. American Express Travel Belated Servs. Co., 566 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Soffer v. Leopold, 531 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Second, we deny the defendants’ petition for a writ of certiorari as to the balance…
• W.J. Spradley, Jr. v. OLD Harmony Baptist Church, 721 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …rve the “status quo” until a final determination of the issues could be reached, as the Church contends, the language in the order is nevertheless injunctive and must comply with the requirements for issuance of an injunction. See Camji v. Helmsley, 602 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (rejecting argument that order only sought to preserve “status quo” by prohibiting appellants’ removal of garbage bin because “[t]he very purpose of a temporary injunction is to preserve the status quo”; thus the prohibitory order…
• Sylvio Tabet v. Tabet, 644 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
  …ring or divesting herself of any interest she may have in the properties. “The very purpose of a temporary injunction is to preserve the status quo in order to prevent irreparable harm from occurring before a dispute is resolved.” Camji v. Helmsley, 602 So. 2d 617, 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Considering the facts of this ease, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the elements necessary to grant the temporary injunction were present. See U.S. Mfg. and Galvanizing Corp. v. Renfrow, 592 S…