FINROCK INDUSTRIES AND CLAIMS CENTER, APPELLANTS,
v.
RUSSELL SINENI, APPELLEE
FINROCK INDUSTRIES AND CLAIMS CENTER, APPELLANTS,
RUSSELL SINENI, APPELLEE
600 So. 2d 573
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) is affirmed. We agree with both parties, however, that the order of the JCC should not be construed to require the carrier to pay penalties on benefits that are due in the future.
ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jackson v. State, 631 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…CURIAM. The lower court’s order denying Jackson’s motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed without prejudice to Jackson’s right to seek post-conviction relief in compliance with Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Poole v. State, 600 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Daniels v. State, 450 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). SMITH, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.…
-
Jackson v. State, 656 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…n a subsequent motion which complies with the requirements of rule 3.850, of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Ramsey v. State, 632 So. 2d 700, 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Jackson v. State, 631 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Poole v. State, 600 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Daniels v. State, 450 So. 2d 601, 602 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.…