THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKE CITY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LAKE CITY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
67 Fla. 6
Florida Supreme Court (1914)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause coming on for final hearing upon transcript of record and briefs of the respective parties, and having been duly considered by the Court,, and no reversible error being made to appear, it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the judgment of the Circuit Court, to review which the writ of error was sued out herein, be and the same is hereby affirmed at the costs-of plaintiff in error.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
George E. Sebring Co. v. O'Rourke, 134 So. 556 (Fla. 1931)…ovided by law. Glenn on Creditor's Rights and Remedies, Sec. 82. For example, the mortgagee cannot enforce a mortgage executed without consideration and with intent to defraud creditors when the mortgagee is a party to the fraud (Chesser v. Chesser,67 Fla. 6, 64 So. 357) though a deed founded upon nominal consideration is not absolutely fraudulent per se, but affords "prima facie" evidence of fraud. Russ vs. Blackshear, 88 Fla. 573, 102 So. 749. The statute provides that a conveyance shall be void as ag…
-
Chaykin v. Kant, 327 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…me and, therefore, the court was correct in not aiding Chaykin by enforcing the mortgage but instead leaving Chaykin [*795] where he placed himself and dismissing his suit. Burton v. McMillan, 1907, 52 Fla. 228, 42 So. 879; Chesser v. Chesser, 1914, 67 Fla. 6, 64 So. 357. Affirmed.…