IRA TOOMER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-06-16
No. 91-3024
Before BARKDULL, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
599 So. 2d 780 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Ira Toomer appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted robbery and attempted battery. We affirm.

It was, as the defense contends, impermissible for the State to ask a witness if another witness is lying. Mosley v. State, 569 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Whitfield v. State, 549 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Boatwright v. State, 452 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). The objection was correctly sustained, and there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion for mistrial.

While the detective’s testimony exceeded to some degree that which is permitted by State v. Baird, 572 So. 2d 904, 908 (Fla.1990), there was no objection to the statement about which defendant now complains. In view of the unobjected-to testimony, the solitary objected-to statement was cumulative.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lyons v. State, 622 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. State v. Delva, 575 So. 2d 643 (Fla.1991); Toomer v. State, 599 So. 2d 780 (Fla.3d DCA 1992).…
  • Joseph v. State, 868 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
    …y were “not accurate.” It is clear that a prosecutor may not ask a witness whether another witness was lying. See Knowles v. State, 632 So. 2d [*8] 62, 65-66 (Fla.1993); Boatwright v. State, 452 So. 2d 666, 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Toomer v. State, 599 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (following Boatwright); McKinney v. State, 579 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (same); Mosley v. State, 569 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (same). All of these cases involve a direct question posed to a witness as to whether another…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw