AMERICO ROSALES, APPELLANT,
v.
ELIZABETH ROSALES, APPELLEE
AMERICO ROSALES, APPELLANT,
ELIZABETH ROSALES, APPELLEE
599 So. 2d 779
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial judge correctly sustained the appellee-mother’s exceptions to the general master’s “downward departure” from the child support guidelines. See § 61.30(2), Fla.Stat. (1991); Weinstein v. Steele, 590 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Lau v. Lau, 407 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (income of custodial parent’s new spouse not properly considered in determining noncustodial parent’s child support obligation); Montgomery v. Montgomery, 426 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (same); Fried v. Fried, 375 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) (same); Schneider v. Schneider, 348 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (same).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hampton v. State, 375 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Schneider v. Schneider, 348 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
- LAU v. LAU, 407 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Weinstein v. Francine R. Steele, 590 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
- Montgomery v. Daty L. Montgomery, 426 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)