CLAIRE MARIE FIELDING, APPELLANT,
v.
WALTER A. CERRATO, M.D., ET AL., APPELLEES
CLAIRE MARIE FIELDING, APPELLANT,
WALTER A. CERRATO, M.D., ET AL., APPELLEES
599 So. 2d 274
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, J., concurs and concurs specially with opinion.
Concurrence
GRIFFIN, Judge,-
concurring specially.
I agree that the final judgment based on the jury verdict in this case should be affirmed. I write only to express my disagreement with the lower court’s ruling that the amount of compensation paid to an expert witness to testify in a medical malpractice case, or any case for that matter, is “irrelevant”. See, e.g., Langston v. King, 410 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thompson v. State, 761 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 2000)…concur. . Our decision in Haag specifically concerned the filing of a postconviction motion. Subsequently, the rule was generally extended to other types of filings. See, e.g., Gonzalez v. State, 604 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Higgs v. State, 599 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).…
-
Higgs v. State, 601 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)…udge. In this habeas corpus proceeding we appointed the trial judge as commissioner to determine whether under the mailbox rule1 petitioner timely appealed an order summarily denying his 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. See Higgs v. State, 599 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). The trial court found that petitioner’s 3.850 motion was denied August 1, 1990, and his timely motion for rehearing was denied August 20, 1990. The court further found' that petitioner’s notice of appeal was postmarked September…
Authorities Cited
- Fla. Power Corp. v. Baker, 410 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)