VENESSA JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VENESSA JONES, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
597 So. 2d 972
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Ross v. State, 386 So. 2d 1191 (Fla.1980); Graves v. State, 587 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Everett v. State, 579 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Golden State Indus., Inc. v. Amparo Cueto, 883 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…DCA 1992). In order to demonstrate the existence of such defenses, Golden State filed an answer and affirmative defenses which included the absence of personal jurisdiction as one of several defenses. See id.; Pieco, Inc. v. Sunset Amoco West, Inc., 597 So. 2d 972, 973 (Fla. [*825] 3d DCA 1992). Rule 1.140(h)(1) specifically allows the defense of lack of jurisdiction over the person to be presented in a responsive pleading, i.e., an answer. See M.T.B. Banking Corp. v. Bergamo Da Silva, 592 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 3…
Authorities Cited
- Ross v. State, 386 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 1980)
- Everett v. State, 579 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
- Graves v. State, 587 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)