STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
RODRICK C. COATNEY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appeals a trial court's decision to withhold adjudication of guilt for a felony DUI conviction. The appellate court holds that state law prohibits withholding adjudication for any DUI violation and reverses, requiring the trial court to pronounce adjudication of guilt.
Section 316.656(1) expressly prohibits courts from suspending, deferring, or withholding adjudication of guilt for any violation of section 316.193. The trial court was not authorized to withhold adjudication, and adjudication of guilt must be pronounced.
[1] A court may not suspend, defer, or withhold adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence for any violation of Florida Statute § 316.193.
[2] Withholding adjudication of guilt for driving under the influence offenses is precluded by Florida Statute § 316.656(1).
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“no court may suspend, defer, or withhold adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence for any violation of s. 316.193”
The statutory provision establishing the mandatory nature of adjudication for DUI violations
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellee Coatney pleaded nolo contendere to felony DUI under Florida Statute 316.193(2)(b). Because he had no prior felony convictions, the trial cour…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Withholding Adjudication Of Guilt cases and more on FLexlaw
JOANOS, Chief Judge.
Appellee Rodrick C. Coatney pled nolo contendere to a felony charge of driving under the influence. See § 316.193(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989). Because appellee had no prior felony convictions, the trial court withheld adjudication of guilt, and placed him on probation for three years with a special condition of thirty days in the county jail. In addition, appellee was required to make restitution for property damage, to pay a fine of $1,000.00, and to perform 150 hours of community service during the probationary period. The state contends that section 316.656, Florida Statutes (1989), does not permit the trial court to withhold adjudication of guilt for any violation of section 316.193. We agree and reverse.
In State v. Whitaker, 590 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), the court reversed a ruling in which the trial court withheld adjudication of guilt for the felony offense of driving under the influence. The Whitaker opinion relied upon the reasoning set forth in Wooten v. State, 332 So. 2d 15 (Fla.1976), in which the supreme court concluded that mandatory adjudication gave effect to legislative intent to discourage drunken driving, by authorizing progressively harsher sentences for multiple offenders. Absent adjudication, the progressively harsher sentences contemplated by the statute could not be imposed.
The applicable provision, section 316.-656(1), Florida Statutes (1989), states in pertinent part:
(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 948.01, no court may suspend, defer, or withhold adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence for any violation of s. 316.193, ... (Emphasis supplied.)
The second district held that “the sentencing requirements of this section are mandatory and cannot be circumvented.” State v. Griffith, 540 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). We agree since appellee in this case pled nolo contendere to a violation of section 316.193(2)(b), the provisions of section 316.656(1) apply. Section 316.-656(1), expressly precludes withholding of adjudication “for any violation of s. 316.-193.” Therefore, the trial court was not authorized to withhold adjudication in this instance.
Accordingly, this cause is remanded with directions to pronounce adjudication of guilt in accordance with the provisions of section 316.656(1), Florida Statutes (1989).
SHIVERS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Rivera, 686 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…ial court’s decision to withhold adjudication of guilt on the defendant’s sentence for vehicular homicide. The defendant concedes that the trial court erred in withholding an adjudication of guilt. See § 316.656, Fla. Stat. (1995); State v. Coatney, 596 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We [*680] reverse and remand to the trial court for the imposition of an adjudication of guilt. With regard to the issues raised in the defendant’s cross-appeal, we find no error and therefore, affirm. AFFIRMED in part; REVERS…
Authorities Cited
- Wooten v. State, 332 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 1976)
- State v. Griffith, 540 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
- State v. Whitaker, 590 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)