METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, APPELLANT,
v.
CALIXTO FERNANDEZ, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1992-01-17
No. 91-847
SHIVERS, BOOTH and MINER, JJ., concur.
595 So. 2d 86 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992) Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Finding that this court’s prior en banc holding in Doctor’s Business Service, Inc. v. Clark, 498 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) is applicable to the facts of the instant case, we affirm the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims finding that appel-lee/claimant’s accident was compensable and awarding benefits.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS, BOOTH and MINER, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • J.M.S. v. State, 921 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …jury trials. Herring v. New York, 422 U.S. 853, 857-58, 95 S.Ct. 2550, 45 L.Ed.2d 593 (1975). Permitting a closing argument to be made in writing does not cure the trial court’s error in denying the right to make a closing argument. M.E.F. v. State, 595 So. 2d 86, 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). See also S.G. v. State, 678 So. 2d 495, 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (reversing adjudications after trial court refused to permit closing argument in delinquency proceeding); T.W. v. State, 677 So. 2d 111, 111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…
  • McD. v. State, 607 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
    …PER CURIAM. The appellant correctly contends that her constitutional rights were violated when the trial judge adjudicated the appellant guilty without first permitting her defense counsel to present a closing argument. M.E.F. v. State, 595 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA1992). In this case, not only did the trial judge not permit closing argument, he [*514] terminated the trial during the course of the state’s cross examination of the appellant, a clear violation of the appellant’s trial rights guarante…
  • D.B. v. State, 979 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
    …uvenile defendants were denied the right to present a closing argument. See J.M.S. v. State, 921 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); T.W. v. State, 677 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); T. McD. v. State, 607 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); M.E.F. v. State, 595 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); E.C. v. State, 588 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); E.V.R. v. State, 342 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Invariably, those courts remanded for new adjudicatory hearings. D.B. maintains that the above-captioned authorities illus [*112…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw