ANDREW LAMACHE, APPELLANT,

v.

WEATHERING RESEARCH SERVICE COMPANY, AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Thomas J. Konrad & Assocs., Inc. v. McCOY, 705 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …lear that a debtor may not transfer property owned by himself, individually, to himself and his wife as tenants by the entire-ties if such a transfer will defraud creditors by putting that property beyond the creditors’ reach.” Valdivia v. Valdivia, 593 So. 2d 1190, 1192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Appellant’s response to McCoy’s motion to quash the writ was that the funds in the account had been paid to McCoy, individually, after the judgment had been entered, to satisfy a debt owed to McCoy, individually. Appellant…
• Camus v. Prokosch, 882 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
  …his military severance to his new wife). We would not allow such transfers to defraud creditors; therefore, the trial court should not have allowed these transfers to reduce the father’s obligations to his child. See generally, Valdivia v. Valdivia, 593 So. 2d 1190, 1192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (“The law is clear that a debtor may not transfer property owned by himself, individually, to himself and his wife as tenants by the entireties, if such a transfer will defraud creditors by putting that property beyond the c…
• Havoco OF Am., Ltd. v. Hill, 197 F.3d 1135 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …tor’s right to the homestead exemption.” Id. at 5. However, the bankruptcy court did find that “Florida fraudulent conveyance law has been properly applied to situations involving tenancies by the entireties.” Id. at 7 (citing Valdivia v. Valdivia, 593 So. 2d 1190, 1192 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1992)). Thus, Havoeo did have a valid basis to challenge Hill’s conversion of non-exempt assets into assets exempt as jointly held property. However, the bankruptcy court further concluded that it would be improper “to ‘coll…

  ← 1 / 2 →