ALMA TRUDELL AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, APPELLANTS,
v.
NATHANIEL WILLIAMS, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1992-02-21
No. 91-01702
RYDER, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.
593 So. 2d 328 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, Judge.

PATTERSON, Judge.

Affirmed. See Hillman v. Hillman, 567 So. 2d 1066, 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (“The child support guidelines, as helpful as they may be to an overburdened court, should not be automatically applied; the court should consider both the needs of the child and the overall financial circumstances of the parties.”).

RYDER, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Boyt v. Romanow, 664 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
    ….13(l)(a) & (5) is to require that the guidelines be applied in all cases in response to a number of cases, including Huff v. Huff, 556 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Todes-co v. Todesco, 583 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); and Tmde.ll v. Williams, 593 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), which hold that the guidelines, while helpful, are not to be applied automatically. See Final Bill Analysis & Economic Impact Statement of the House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary to CS/HB 707 (1993). In this opinion,…
  • Palm Beach Cnty. Sheriff v. State, 854 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
    …So. 2d 202 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding that the “trial court violated the separation of powers doctrine in considering the [Department’s] ability to move funds in order to comply with its mandate”); Dep’t of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. State, 593 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (observing that “it is not the judiciary’s role to revise legislative appropriations”). AFFIRMED. MAY, J., and DAMOORGIAN, DORIAN, Associate Judge, concur.…
  • In the Interest of R.V., 626 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
    …is mother. The order must be reversed because the state judiciary lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review discretionary acts of the executive branch affecting the use of state resources. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. State, 593 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (“it is not the judiciary’s role to review legislative appropriations to interfere with an agency’s discretionary budgetary decisions”); Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. V.L., 583 So. 2d 765, 767 (Fla. 5th DCA…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw