N. M. COMER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
FRANCES HETHERINGTON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
N. M. COMER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
FRANCES HETHERINGTON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
65 Fla. 329
Florida Supreme Court (1913)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The findings and judgment in this case are similar to those in the case of Brown v. Hetherington this day decided; therefore, on the authority of that case the judgment herein is reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McRainey v. Langston, 92 Fla. 903 (Fla. 1926)…, 67 Fla. 1, 64 South. Rep. 358; Tampa Electric Co. v. Charles, 69 Fla. 27, 67 South. Rep. 572; Gadsden v. State, 77 Fla. 627, 82 South. Rep. 50. The fifth assignment of error having, then, no basis in proper exceptions, must fall. Foster v. Sunday, 65 Fla. 329, 61 South. Rep. 625. We find that the sixth assignment of error fails for the same reason as the fifth, there being no exception taken by defendants in the court below to the ruling sought to be reviewed by said assignment of error. . The seventh…