INTERVISA, CORP., APPELLANT,
v.
BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., APPELLEE
INTERVISA, CORP., APPELLANT,
BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., APPELLEE
590 So. 2d 1124
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Hendricks v. Dailey, 208 So. 2d 101 (Fla.1968); Diamond v. Rosenfeld, 511 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), review denied 520 So. 2d 586 (Fla.1988); Idy Corporation v. Fenton, 454 So. 2d 13 (Fla.3d DCA 1984); Cirou v. Basler, 432 So. 2d 628 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); § 620.125, Fla.Stat. (1989).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Parker, 601 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 1992)…PER CURIAM. We review State v. Parker, 590 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), in which the court rendered a per curiam decision without opinion citing as controlling authority State v. Lucas, 570 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Because the Lucas decision was pending review in this Court, we accepted jurisdi…
Authorities Cited
- Hendricks v. Dailey, 208 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 1968)
- Cirou v. Basler, 432 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Diamond v. Rosenfeld, 511 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
- IDY Corp. v. Penelope Fenton, 454 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)