THE STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. J. C. BLOCKER, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
S. S. COACHMAN ET AL. AS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court held that a petition to change a county site under Chapter 6239 (Acts of 1911) requires signatures from one-third of the qualified electors who are taxpayers, not one-third of all qualified electors who must all be taxpayers. The court reversed the lower court's dismissal of the mandamus action and ordered the County Commissioners to call an election on the county site question.
The statute requires signatures from one-third of the qualified electors who are taxpayers on real or personal property, not one-third of all qualified electors who must all be taxpayers. The petition in this case met the statutory requirement with 422 taxpaying qualified electors signing when only 338 were needed.
“the requirement of section 1 that the petition shall be 'signed by one-third of the qualified electors, who are taxpayers on real or personal property,' means that the petition must be signed by one-third of all of the qualified electors, all of which one-third must be taxpayers on real or personal property. Such a construction does not comport with the evident intent of the lawmaking power”
Establishes the court's rejection of the respondents' interpretation of the statute.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBlocker and others filed a mandamus petition asking the Pinellas County Commissioners to call an election on whether to change the county site, based …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mandamus cases and more on FLexlaw
Whitfield, C. J.
Blocker and others brought mandamus to compel the County Commissioners of Pinellas County to call an election upon the question of changing and establishing the county site of Pinellas ,county on a petition presented under Chapter 6239 Acts of 1911. A motion to quash the alternative writ was sustained, and to a judgment for the respondents the relators took writ of error. The questions presented involve a construction of the following provisions of Chapter 6239: “An Act to provide for the change and establishment of county sites, calling elections therefor,” &c.
“Section 1. That from and after the passage of this Act the qualified electors in any county in this State wishing to change their county site, shall present to the Board of County Commissioners of such county a petition signed by one-third of the qualified electors, who are taxpayers on real or personal property, praying for a change of the location of such county site.
Section 10. The provisions of this Act shall not apply to any county having constructed a new court house within the past twenty years.”
It is contended for the respondents that the requirement of section 1 that the petition shall be “signed by one-third of the qualified electors, who are taxpayers on real or personal property,” means that the petition must be signed by one-third of all of the qualified electors, all of which one-third must be taxpayers on real or personal property. Such a construction does not comport with the evident intent of the lawmaking power, since the leading idea of the section is that the calling of an election to determine the question of a change of the location of the county site shall be at the instance of a stated material portion of those who are both taxpayers and qualified electors of the county. The taxpaying qualified electors are presumably a more permanent and responsible portion of the population who bear the burdens, and a given proportion of taxpaying qualified electors can be more readily and definitely ascertained and established than a given proportion of merely qualified electors. The alternative writ shows that the petition filed with the County Commissioners under Section 1 of Chapter 6239, is signed by 802 qualified electors of whom 422 are taxpayers on real and personal property in the county; that the total number of qualified, electors in the county is 2150 of whom only 1013 are taxpayers. The requisite one-third of the taxpaying qualified electors of the county is therefore only 338, while 422 of the 802 who signed the petition are taxpaying qualified electors of the county. Chapter 6239 is not in its terms or purpose confined to the change of county sites that had already been permanently located.
The judgment is reversed.
Taylor, Shackleford, Cockrell and Hooker, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Volusia Cnty. v. Eubank, 151 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963)…cretionary power as hereinabove mentioned. Mandamus is available to coerce the performance of the ministerial duties imposed under F.S. Chapter 138, F.S.A., in accordance with the essential requirements of the law. State ex rel. Blocker v. Coachman, 64 Fla. 478, 60 So. 344, was an action in mandamus to compel the Board of County Commissioners of Pinellas County to call an election on the question of whether the county seat of that county should be relocated. The trial court granted respondents’ motion to q…