EDMONSON S. COURIC, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, AND DONIA ALCOCK, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-12-17
No. 91-1208
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
590 So. 2d 539 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Edmonson S. Couric, Jr., the former employer, appeals an order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission. As the conflicts in evidence were resolved by the trier of fact, and as the findings of fact are supported by substantial competent evidence, the judgment is affirmed. See Heifetz v. Department of Business Regulation, 475 So. 2d 1277, 1281-82 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); §§ 120.57(l)(b)10, 120.68(10), Fla. Stat. (1989). We find no error in the referee’s treatment of the draft employment agreement introduced in evidence at the hearing, and agree with the Commission that the facts found by the referee do not show disqualifying misconduct on the part of the employee. See § 443.036(26), Fla. Stat. (1989); Hartenstein v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security, 383 So. 2d 759, 761-62 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Althan W. Hunt v. D.M. Stratton, Jr., 677 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
    …disability benefits offset provisions, and the failure of the Division of Workers’ Compensation to promulgate a rule setting forth the proper method for calculating such offsets, as this court suggested in Dax & Trim Development Company v. Mullens, 590 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), we find it necessary to set out a formula for calculating [*67] the offset.1 Because federal social security disability benefits are calculated based on monthly figures, a conversion factor of 4.3 is used to convert them to week…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw