ESTEBAN MURO, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ESTEBAN MURO, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
589 So. 2d 1048
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm defendant’s conviction for attempted possession of cocaine.
However, we agree with defendant that conditions 11, 12, 13, and 18 of the conditions of probation imposed in his sentence had not been orally pronounced by the trial court and are, therefore, not properly a part of the sentence. See Zachary v. State, 559 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).
We do not find merit in defendant’s remaining contention concerning the award of fees and costs which had been agreed to by defendant as a part of his plea bargain.
The conviction is affirmed. The sentence is remanded for correction in accordance with this opinion.
RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Knight v. State, 593 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…that condition is too vague to inform Knight of what conduct is acceptable or unacceptable. Further, because that condition of probation had not been orally pronounced by the trial court, it is not properly a part of the sentence. See Muro v. State, 589 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). SCHOONOVER, C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Zachary v. State, 559 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)