SUN BANK/MIAMI, N.A., APPELLANT,
v.
CONSOLIDATED BANK, N.A., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-10-15
No. 91-835
Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
588 So. 2d 14 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. In Re Yohn’s Estate, 238 So. 2d 290 (Fla.1970); Green v. First American Bank and Trust, 511 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Poller v. First Virginia Mortgage and Real Estate Investment Trust, 471 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Wassil v. Gilmour, 465 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Section 59.041, Florida Statutes (1989).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State Farm Gen. Ins. Co. v. Grant, 641 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
    …opportunity to be heard on its Motion for Protective Order in which it objected to the Request to Produce. This was a departure from the essential requirements of law. See, e.g., Psychiatric Institute of Del-Ray, Inc. v. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc., 588 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 4th [*952] DCA 1991) (certiorari granted when not clear whether counsel for both sides understood that the trial court would hear both a motion to intervene and a motion to vacate pretrial discovery orders, petitioners maintained they expected…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw