THE FLORIDA BAR RE J. CHARLES SHORES, JR.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court upheld a referee's denial of J. Charles Shores Jr.'s petition to reinstate his law license after a 1987 suspension for failing to comply with court orders requiring alcohol abstinence and contract compliance. The Court found that Shores' conduct during suspension—including unauthorized practice, tax delinquencies, failure to disclose his suspension, and unpaid child support—demonstrated unfitness to resume practice.
The Court held that Shores failed to meet his burden of demonstrating fitness to resume practice. His conduct during suspension—including unauthorized practice, substantial unresolved tax obligations, failure to disclose his disciplinary status, and delinquent child support—clearly supported denial of reinstatement. The petition was denied without prejudice, with a recommendation that it could be reconsidered upon resolution of IRS obligations.
[1] A suspended attorney bears the burden of demonstrating fitness to resume the practice of law.
[2] Failure to disclose a suspension from the practice of law on a graduate school application supports denial of a petition for reinstatement.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Shores claims that the referee erred in denying his petition for reinstatement and petitions this Court for review. We agree with the referee that Shores' conduct during his suspension clearly supports the denial of the petition. We agree that Shores has failed in his burden to demonstrate his fitness to resume the practice of law.”
The Court's holding that Shores failed to meet his burden of proving fitness for reinstatement, with the conduct during suspension being dispositive.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceShores was suspended in August 1987 for violating a December 1986 court order and consent judgment requiring abstinence from alcohol and compliance wi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attorney Suspension cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is a petition to review the referee’s denial of a petition for reinstatement to membership in The Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 15, of the Florida Constitution and approve the findings and recommendation of the referee.
In the proceedings below the referee found that the petitioner, J. Charles Shores, Jr.,
was suspended from the practice of law by Order of the Supreme Court of Florida dated August 28, 1987 for his failure to comply with the Court’s December 1986 opinion as well as the Petitioner’s February 17, 1986 Consent Judgment. This Consent required him, among other things, to refrain from the use of alcohol and to comply with the contract entered into between himself and FLA, Inc. ... Petitioner entered into a new alcohol rehabilitation contract with FLA, Inc. on March 13, 1989, which terminates on March 13, 1992. The Petitioner is in compliance with the FLA, Inc. rehabilitation contract and is a recovering alcoholic.
On December 13, 1988, more than one year after his suspension by the Supreme Court of Florida, the Petitioner sent a hand written letter and notice of appearance to County Court Judge Perry A. Little ... requesting the continuance of a civil matter involving the Petitioner’s brother. The Petitioner’s notice of appearance failed to advise Judge Perry of his suspension.
The Internal Revenue Service filed a $44,000.00 claim against the Petitioner which is still outstanding. The Internal Revenue Service also has an additional claim against the Petitioner for a sum of approximately $78,000.00, which remains outstanding and unresolved. The Petitioner has not filed an income tax return with the IRS since 1982 except that the Petitioner filed an extension to file a 1989 return with the IRS after filing his petition for reinstatement with the Supreme Court of Florida.
The Petitioner is delinquent in back child support payments to his dependent child, although the former spouse has not initiated any legal proceeding to enforce same.
The Petitioner failed to advise the University of South Florida in his graduate school application that he was suspended from the practice of law and merely stated that he was admitted to practice in the courts of Florida and Federal courts.
Prior to his involvement with alcohol, the Petitioner had a good professional reputation.
The referee recommended that Shores’ petition for reinstatement be denied without prejudice. The referee also recommended that if Shores resolves his Internal Revenue Service obligations, his petition should be reconsidered when permitted by the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Shores claims that the referee erred in denying his petition for reinstatement and petitions this Court for review. We agree with the referee that Shores’ conduct during his suspension clearly supports the denial of the petition. We agree that Shores has failed in his burden to demonstrate his fitness to resume the practice of law. See In re Jahn, 559 So. 2d 1089 (Fla.1990); In re Timson, 301 So. 2d 448 (Fla.1974); In re Dawson, 131 So. 2d 472 (Fla.1961).
Accordingly, the petition for reinstatement is denied. Judgment for costs in the amount of $4,634.14 is hereby entered against J. Charles Shores, Jr., for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur. BARKETT and KOGAN, JJ., concur in result only.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Fla. BAR re Michael Howard Wolf, 21 So. 3d 15 (Fla. 2009)…ngaged in conduct that constituted the practice of law during his suspension and he continues to be financially irresponsible, the recommendation as to reinstatement lacks a basis in existing case law and must be disapproved. See Fla. Bar re Shores, 587 So. 2d 1313 (Fla.1991) (denying reinstatement of a lawyer who practiced law while under suspension and was financially irresponsible). Therefore, despite the evidence presented vouching for Wolfs character and reputation, we reject the referee’s recommendation…
-
The Fla. Bar Re: Brian John Murtha (Fla. 2021)…son, we find the referee’s recommendation lacks a basis in the rules and existing case law. See Wolf, 21 So. 3d at 18 (denying reinstatement of a lawyer who practiced law while under suspension and was financially irresponsible); Fla. Bar re Shores, 587 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. 1991) (same). While suspended, Murtha used his trust account, did not file the required quarterly reports of the legal work performed for his brother’s firm, mismanaged his operating account, and self-filed late and incorrect tax forms that ha…
Authorities Cited
- In re Petition of William B. Dawson, III, 131 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 1961)
- In re THE Fla. BAR. In re Robert Duncan Timson, 301 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1974)
- THE Fla. BAR re Michael Joseph Jahn, 559 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 1990)