JULIO DAVILA AKA JOSE COLLAZO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-10-15
No. 91-2241
Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
586 So. 2d 1348 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Roberts v. State, 568 So. 2d 1255 (Fla.1990).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Meenan v. Newman, 662 So. 2d 1320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
    …eason, prohibition is granted so as to prevent respondents from further enforcing the order of reference. Moreover, we grant mandamus to compel the respondent to hear and determine the matters encompassed in the order of reference. Rosen v. Solomon, 586 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). We assume issuance of a formal writ will not be necessary. Relief awarded.…
  • Calderon v. Kalb, 963 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
    …relief from an order appointing a special magistrate to conduct the examination of assets provided by the statute. The basis of the objection is that the petitioner did not consent to the appointment. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.490(c); Rosen v. Solomon, 586 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), review denied, 598 So. 2d 78 (Fla.1992); Pesut v. Miller, 773 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Consent, however, is not required in this instance simply because the statute, which obviously trumps the rule, see 12A Fla. Jur.2d, Co…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw