PHILLIP MANGANELLI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1991-07-26
No. 91-00038
DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.
582 So. 2d 826 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence to its oral pronouncement that the appellant serve 364 days in the county jail as a special condition of probation. The written sentence erroneously reflects that the appellant serve 364 days followed by five years on probation. The appellant need not be present for this purpose. Esposito v. State, 424 So. 2d 160 (Fla.2d DCA 1982).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw