IQBAL ZABRANI, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Strama v. Union Fid. Life Ins. Co., 793 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
  …. 2d 58, 60 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). When “there is a genuine issue of material fact as to the interpretation that the parties gave the ambiguous contract provision,” summary judgment is inappropriate. Hancock v. Brumer, Cohen, Logan, Kandell & Kaufman, 580 So. 2d 782, 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Here, the trial court did not apply the correct law to the terms of these contracts. Florida law does not support the trial court’s conclusion that the workers’ compensation concept of total disability should be applied to…
• Birwelco-Montenay, Inc. v. Infilco Degremont, Inc., 827 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …ations. Dade County School Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638 (Fla.1999); Miller v. [*257] Kase, 789 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Palazzolo v. Fessler, 680 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Hancock v. Brumer, Cohen, Logan, Kandell & Kaufman, 580 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Langner v. Charles A. Binger, Inc., 503 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Here, each side argues that the contract is clear and unambiguous, and it should be construed consistent with that side’s position. However, “each [side] asc…
• CEM Enters., Inc. v. State, 868 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
  …793 So. 2d at 1132 (“When ‘there is a genuine issue of material fact as to the interpretation that the parties gave the ambiguous contract provision,’ summary judgment is inappropriate.”) (quoting Hancock v. Brumer, Cohen, Logan, Kandell & Kaufman, 580 So. 2d 782, 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)); see also Birwelco-Montenay, Inc. v. Infilco Degremont, Inc., 827 So. 2d 255, 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that where each side ascribes a different meaning to what the sides claim is the unambiguous language in a contrac…

Authorities Cited

• Rembert v. State, 445 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 1984)