SAM WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The restitution order is reversed because the defendant lacked notice and an opportunity to be heard regarding it. Other points raised by the defendant did not constitute reversible error.
Defendant was convicted and sentenced for attempted second degree murder. The State confessed error regarding the restitution order, and the defendant…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Sam Williams, defendant below, appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted second degree murder. Upon the State’s confession of error, the restitution order is reversed on the ground that the defendant did not have notice and an opportunity to be heard with respect thereto. This ruling is without prejudice to entry of a restitution order upon notice and an opportunity to be heard.1 We have carefully considered the other points raised by defendant2 and conclude that no reversible error has been shown.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
. While defendant also asserts error with respect to entry of a cost order, the judgment in the present record does not award costs. That issue is, at present, moot.
. On the merits of the conviction and sentence, this was a proceeding under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which the Public Defender submitted a memorandum and defendant also submitted a brief.