THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
WAYNE FLEMMINGS, DEMETRIC LANDERS, EDDIE MOORE, ANDREW BRINSON, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-05-07
Nos. 90-1798, 90-1805, 90-1811 and 90-1812
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.
579 So. 2d 780 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Claiming defendants were ineligible to be sentenced as youthful offenders, the state appeals the sentences ordered in the instant cases. We reverse.

The defendant juveniles were charged with and pled guilty to attempted murder with a deadly weapon and, over the state’s objection, sentenced under the Youthful Offender Act. According to section 958.-04(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1989), that act specifically excludes persons found guilty of life felonies. Where a firearm is employed in an attempted murder, as in the instant case, the offense is reclassified to a life felony. § 775.087(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). Therefore, the trial court erred in sentencing these defendants as youthful offenders.

Accordingly, the convictions and sentences are reversed with directions that on remand defendants be permitted to withdraw their pleas as they were made based upon the illegal sentences promised.

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hemphill v. State, 579 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
    …ny. While we agree that an improper guidelines calculation may be the subject of a 3.850 proceeding, State v. Chaplin, 490 So. 2d 52 (Fla.1986), the point raised here is substantively incorrect. § 775.087(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989); State v. Flemmings, 579 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 3d 1991); Williams v. State, 360 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).1 Affirmed. . We need not decide whether even an incorrect guidelines determination makes any difference when, as here, there is a plea agreement to a specific sentence which…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw