RODOLFO NODAL-TARAFA, APPELLANT,
v.
ARDC CORPORATION, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pleading Sufficiency cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The final order which dismisses with prejudice the plaintiff Rodolfo Nodal-Tara-fa’s claim for tortious interference with an employment relationship as contained in his third amended complaint is affirmed upon a holding that after being given numerous opportunities to amend, the plaintiff was unable to state any operative facts in the amended complaint detailing the specific acts the defendant ARDC Corporation [ARDC] allegedly committed which caused the plaintiff to be discharged as a real estate salesman for Arvida Realty Sales, Inc. Only ultimate legal conclusions are stated therein and such allegations are patently insufficient to state a cause of action against the defendant ARDC, Clark v. Boeing Co., 395 So. 2d 1226, 1229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(b).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Irve Gladstone v. Smith, 729 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…aint through a licensed attorney was eminently reasonable, hardly an abuse of its discretion. To summarize, where no viable cause of action is asserted after repeated opportunities to amend, dismissal is appropriate. See Nodal-Tarafa v. ARDC Corp., 579 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Gladstone was given a more than adequate opportunity to frame a viable cause of action, but he failed to do so. His “claims” fail to offer facts sufficient to state a cause of action. See, e.g., Estate of Smith v. City of Hollywo…
-
Abel Flores Gonzalez v. State, 233 So. 3d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…e or one of its agencies); Gladstone v. Smith, 729 So. 2d 1002, 1005 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (holding that “where no viable cause of action is asserted after repeated opportunities to amend, dismissal is appropriate”) (citing Nodal-Tarafa v. ARDC Corp., 579 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)).…
Authorities Cited
- Waltraud Mary Sexsmith Clark and Richard J. Clark v. The Boeing Co., 395 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)