DOUGLAS G. NORRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A real estate salesman whose license was revoked by the Florida Real Estate Commission appeals, arguing the Commission failed to consider mitigating evidence. The court affirms the revocation, finding the Commission properly considered the evidence and acted within its statutory authority.
The Commission did not err in revoking Norris's license. The record demonstrates that Norris presented mitigating evidence to the Commission, which properly considered it and imposed discipline within the statutory guidelines.
[1] A real estate license may be revoked upon conviction of a crime related to the activities of a licensed real estate salesman or involving moral turpitude.
[2] A real estate licensee has a duty to notify the licensing commission in writing within thirty days of pleading guilty to a felony.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The respondent was properly served with the Notice of Hearing, appeared and presented matters in mitigation.”
Establishes that Norris was afforded procedural due process and presented mitigating evidence at the hearing
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn the early 1980s, Norris engaged in marijuana smuggling and money laundering, purchasing property under assumed names to store marijuana and facilit…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Administrative Complaint cases and more on FLexlaw
BARKDULL, Judge.
The appellant seeks review of an order of the Florida Real Estate Commission which revoked the appellant’s real estate salesman’s license. In the early 1980’s the appellant engaged in the smuggling of marijuana and used the profits therefrom to purchase real property in North Carolina and Virginia, under assumed names, to be used as stash houses for storing the marijuana. During this period, he facilitated the importation of about 29 tons of marijuana. Subsequent to commission of these acts in 1986, the appellant obtained his real estate license. After receiving his real estate salesman’s license, the appellant was charged with the aforementioned crimes by Federal Grand Jury indictment. He pleaded guilty to certain counts, was convicted, and sentenced to a federal prison in 1986. He did not notify the appellee of any of these events.
On January 23, 1990, a complaint was filed with the Department of Professional Regulation, per Section 455.225(1), Florida Statutes (1989).
The probable cause panel of the Commission found probable cause to believe that a violation of the Florida Real Estate Practice Act occurred per Section 475.25(l)(f), (n), (p), Florida Statutes (1989).
This finding resulted in the filing of an Administrative Complaint by the Florida Division of Real Estate (Appellee), charging the Appellant with three (3) numbered counts, including: Count I — guilty of having been convicted of a crime which relates to the activities of a licensed real estate salesman or involves moral turpitude; Count II — guilty of having failed to notify the Commission in writing within thirty (30) days after pleading guilty to a felony; and, Count III — guilty of having been confined in a federal prison.
The appellant was served with a copy of the Administrative Complaint and thereafter filed an Election of Rights in which he answered:
“I do not dispute the allegations of fact contained in the Administrative Complaint, but I do wish to be accorded an informal hearing or proceeding, pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Floridas Statutes, at which time I will be permitted to submit oral and written evidence in mitigation to the Florida Real Estate Commission.”
Based upon appellant’s election, appellee filed a Motion For Final Order. The Informal Hearing was noticed before the Commission.
The Commission found that:
“The respondent was properly served with the Notice of Hearing, appeared and presented matters in mitigation.
Based upon the allegations of fact and upon the information provided to the Commission at its meeting of June 19, 1990, the Commission finds the Respondent appellant guilty of violating § 475.25(l)(f), ... (n), and ... (p), Florida Statutes. Therefore, the Commission ORDERS that the licenses of Douglas G. Norris be revoked....”
Maximum penalties for the three (3) provisions are as follows:
(f) — Up to 7 years suspension or revocation
(p) — Suspended up to 5 years or revocation
(n) — Suspension for period of confinement or revocation,
Rule 21V-24.001, Florida Administrative Code.
By this appeal, the appellant contends the Commission erred in revoking his license without taking into consideration the mitigating evidence offered by the appellant.
The appellee responds that the record shows that the appellant did, in fact, present mitigating evidence to the Commission and there is nothing to show that the Commission did not take this evidence into consideration in imposing its discipline, which was within the guidelines set forth in the Florida Administrative Code. Rule 21V-24.00, Florida Administrative Code.
Affirmed.