IN THE INTEREST OF D.B., A CHILD

Citator

Cited By

• Elliott v. State, 597 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
  …the necessity of mentioning the race of the suspects. However, it is a fact in the record which drew the detective’s attention to the activity. As we have noted in other cases, it alone does not raise founded suspicion. . See also State v. Isaacs, 578 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); State v. Hoover, 520 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Ewen v. State, 518 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 528 So. 2d 1181 (Fla.1988); Murphy v. State, 512 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 520 So. 2d 585…
• Harris v. State, 761 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
  …must be judged against an objective standard: whether the facts available to the police officer at the time of the seizure “warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief’ that the action was appropriate. As Judge Stone wrote in State v. Isaacs, 578 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), “[p]olice may not stop vehicles on a bare suspicion that the occupants are violating the law.” 578 So. 2d at 524; see also Coladonato v. State, 348 So. 2d 326 (Fla.1977). The Isaacs facts are strikingly similar to those here: “…
• Nomar Santiago v. State, 941 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …le to make out any object); Messer v. State, 609 So. 2d 164, 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (holding an officer conducting surveillance in a high crime area who witnessed arm movement between suspects did not have reasonable suspicion). In State v. Isaacs, 578 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), we upheld a trial court decision that an officer did not have a founded suspicion of criminal activity where he observed Isaacs drive, slowly, through a high crime neighborhood at 8:30 p.m., circle, and return. A man on a bicycl…