IN RE ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR

Fla. | 1911-06-01
Shackleford, J., dissents.
62 Fla. 7 Florida Supreme Court (1911) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court addressed whether the Governor could grant successive reprieves totaling more than sixty days when each individual reprieve did not exceed that constitutional limit. The Court held that the constitutional language did not restrict the Governor to a single reprieve, only that each reprieve could not exceed sixty days.


Holding

The Governor has constitutional authority to grant successive reprieves so long as each individual reprieve does not exceed sixty days. The constitutional language limiting reprieves to sixty days applies only to the duration of each separate reprieve, not to the total period of all reprieves combined in a single case.


Key Quotes

“The Governor shall have power to suspend the collection of fines and forfeitures, and to grant reprieves for a period not exceeding sixty days for all offenses, except in cases of impeachment.”

The constitutional provision limiting the Governor's reprieve power that is the subject of interpretation.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Governor issued a warrant for the execution of Will Walker, convicted of first-degree murder in Duval County Circuit Court, scheduled for June 2, …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

State of Florida, Executive Department, Tallahassee, June 21,1911.

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida: Gentlemen: On the 9th day of May, 1911, in pursuance of the provisions of Section 4020 of the General Statutes, I issued a proper warrant directing the execution on the second day of June, 1911, of a sentence to suffer the pains of death imposed upon one Will Walker, alias Sonny Walker, upon a conviction for murder in the first degree in the Circuit Court for Duval County.

On the first day of June, 1911, upon a proper showing, acting under the authority vested in me as Governor, T granted to the said Will Walker, alias Sonny Walker, a reprieve in the execution of the said sentence for a period of twenty-one days, from the second day of June, 1911, to the twenty-third day of June, 1911.

An application has now been submitted to me for a further reprieve in the execution of said sentence, pending the determination of certain legal proceedings insti-' luted or about to be instituted in behalf of the said Will Walker, alias Sonny Walker. Section 11 of Article IY of the State Constitution provides that: “The Governor shall have power to suspend' the collection of fines and forfeitures, and to grant reprieves for a period not exceeding sixty days for all offenses, except in cases of impeachment.”

It appears that the requirements of the public business make it desirable if another reprieve shall be granted in this matter, same be granted for a period of forty-nine days from the twenty-third day of June, 1911.

In the circumstances, I respectfully request the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Court, under Section 13 of Article IV of the State Constitution, as to whether, having already granted in this matter a reprieve for a period of twenty-one days, I can, as Governor, in view of the above quoted provision of Section 11 Article IV of the Constitution, grant a further and additional reprieve of forty-nine daj^s following the expiration of a first reprieve of twenty-one days. I have the honor to remain, Very respectfully, ALBERT W.

GILCHRIST, Governor. State of Florida, Supreme Court.

Tallahassee, June 22, 1911*.

To His Excellency, Albert W.

Gilchrist, Governor of Florida.

Sir: Your communication has been received requesting an opinion under Section 13, of Article IV of the Constitution as to whether your executive powers under the constitution authorize you to grant in a case successive re prieves which taken together cover a period of more than sixty days.

Section 11 of Article IV of the Constitution ordains that “The Governor shall have power to —- grant reprieves for a period not exceeding sixty days, for all offenses, except in cases of impeachment.”

This executive power to grant reprieves is authority to suspend or postpone the execution of a sentence imposed by the courts upon conviction for a crime committed.

In capital cases the sentence of the court is executed upon a warrant issued by the Governor. The quoted provision of the constitution does not limit the granting power to one reprieve in a case; its only limitation is that each reprieve shall be “for a period not exceeding sixty-days.”

Very respectfully, J. B.

WHITFIELD, R. F. TAYLOR, R, S.

COCKRELL, W. A. HOCKER, C. B.

PARKHILL, Justices of the Supreme Court. I deeply regret that I cannot concur with the other Justices in the conclusion which they have reached.

Very briefly stated, I think that while the Governor may grant successive reprieves in a case the total amount of time of such reprieves is limited by the Constitution to sixty days. T. M.

SHACKLEFORD.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ex parte Hyde, 140 Fla. 494 (Fla. 1939)
    …ntence for a definite time. It does not and cannot defeat the ultimate execution of the judgment and sentence of the court, but merely temporarily delays its execution. 20 R. C. L. 522. As was said by this Court in Advisory Opinion of the Governor, 62 Fla. 7, 55 So. 865, “This executive power to grant reprieves is authority to suspend or postpone the execution of a sentence imposed by the courts upon conviction for a crime committed.” As this power to grant reprieves is vested by the Constitution exclu…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw