JOEL B. MANN, APPELLANT,
v.
SYLVIA (SALLIE) MANN, APPELLEE
JOEL B. MANN, APPELLANT,
SYLVIA (SALLIE) MANN, APPELLEE
578 So. 2d 395
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Joel B. Mann, appeals from a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage. We affirm.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in the equitable distribution of the parties’ assets. The record in the case contains conflicting evidence regarding the valuation of the assets. The trial court, having heard the evidence, is in a better position to determine the credibility of the witnesses. Accordingly, the trial court’s findings are presumed correct. Marsh v. Marsh, 419 So. 2d 629 (Fla.1982); Storer v. Storer, 353 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); cert. denied, 360 So. 2d 1250 (Fla.1978); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla.1977); see also Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Straley v. Frank, 585 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…Fla 4th DCA 1989) (decided by appellate court July 1989; special equity not an issue in case); Rouer v. Rouer, 548 So. 2d 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (decided by appellate court September 1989; a P.C.A. merely citing Ball and Canakaris). . Mann v. Mann, 578 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Wolfson v. Cary, 488 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Rabben v. Rabben, 468 So. 2d 500, 501 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). . § 61.075(3)(a)3, Fla.Stat. (1989). . Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980). . Warner v. Sony Corp. o…
-
Suarez v. Suarez, 627 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…valued the husband’s insurance company and did not, as urged, fail to take into account the income tax implications involved in the case. See Werner v. Werner, 587 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), rev. denied, 599 So. 2d 661 (Fla.1992); Mann v. Mann, 578 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Marcoux v. Marcoux, 475 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 486 So. 2d 597 (Fla.1986). Finally, no reversible error is presented by the cross appeal. Accordingly, the final judgment under review is, in all respects,…
-
Ofelia de Armas v. de Armas, 639 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…the trial court did not abuse its discretion in entering the attorney’s fee award. I agree as well, with the court’s determination as to the ownership and valuation of the businesses. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Mann v. Mann, 578 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); I would, however, reverse the portions of the judgment awarding the marital home, distributing the marital assets, and denying the wife permanent alimony. On remand, I would require clarification regarding the award of the marita…
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1977)
- Marsh v. Laurel J. Ising Marsh, 419 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 1982)
- Storer v. Storer, 353 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)