ARTHUR RAY NOBLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ARTHUR RAY NOBLE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
578 So. 2d 63
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Noble appeals the summary denial of his 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the denial of post-conviction relief as to all claims contained in the motion except the claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel based upon trial counsel’s failure to file a motion for new trial. As to this claim, we remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or for attachment of portions of the record show ing the defendant is not entitled to relief. Gentry v. State, 464 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hunter Luzader Terrett v. State, 589 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…e and remand to permit the trial court either to attach to its order the portions of the record showing that appellant is entitled to no relief, or to hold an eviden-tiary hearing. Taylor v. State, 583 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Noble v. State, 578 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gentry v. State, 464 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). REVERSED AND REMANDED. ANSTEAD, HERSEY and GARRETT, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Fla. Atl. Assocs. v. Belmont, 464 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)