CHARLES J. KOWKABANY, NADIMA K. KOWKABANY, AND JOHN B. KOWKABANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
ADCOX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1991-03-26
Nos. 90-26, 90-1336
BOOTH and MINER, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.
578 So. 2d 10 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1991)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, the parties challenge various aspects of the jury trial which resolved claims and counterclaims arising from their construction' contract. Without proceeding into the details of the parties’ contractual arrangement, we affirm as to all but one of the issues raised. We must remand the case only so that the trial court can consolidate the separate final judgments that were issued to each party. See Bellochi v. Andrews, 505 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 511 So. 2d 998 (Fla.1987).

BOOTH and MINER, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw