ROSALYN MOORMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM A. MOORMAN, APPELLEE
ROSALYN MOORMAN, APPELLANT,
WILLIAM A. MOORMAN, APPELLEE
577 So. 2d 726
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment of dissolution. At issue is the award of child support. On review of the record and briefs of the parties herein, we conclude that the case must be remanded so that the trial court can set forth the basis for his decision to impute ten hours of additional income to appellant, the payee spouse who has primary residential responsibility for five children and presently works 30 hours per week. Haas v. Haas, 552 So. 2d 221, 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Mosbarger v. Mosbarger, 547 So. 2d 188, 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
ERVIN, BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McDONALD v. State, 751 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)…be sentenced as a habitual felony offender, to which the sentencing guidelines do not apply. In yet another vindictive sentencing case, the Third District reversed and remanded with instructions to impose a specific sentence. See Beckles v. State, 577 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). The court’s opinion recited no facts, and gave no explanation for its choice of remedy. We can only assume that the circumstances peculiar to that case suggested that the imposition of a specific sentence would be the most just r…
Authorities Cited
- Haas v. Haas, 552 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
- Mosbarger v. Mosbarger, 547 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)